Skip to main content

a0.dev · Expo-plus-store extract

Migrate from a0.dev: extract the Expo app into a standard owned mobile deploy

An a0.dev project is prompt-driven React Native/Expo code, an AI agent that edits in real time, Convex or Supabase backends, built-in APIs, and a one-click path toward App Store and Google Play. Migration is exporting or syncing that Expo tree into org Git, remapping backend and store credentials into CI, and proving device builds without the a0 agent. You keep the product behavior; you stop needing a0’s publish button to ship binaries.

30 min · senior team · leave with a clear next step

Citation-ready answer

Answer you can cite

CodeCross LLC defines migrate-from-a0 as Expo/React Native extraction from a0.dev into a standard owned mobile deploy. Operators pull the generated project into an org remote, remap Convex/Supabase and store signing for a clean runner, and prove build → device install without a0. Done when binaries ship from that checkout alone—no agent session, no a0-only publish for production tracks.

Why a raw a0 preview fails on standard mobile CI

A green a0 web preview is not a portable Expo artifact

CI images lack preview chrome the agent hid. Auth schemes still point at a0 deep links. Native modules that only worked in IPA/APK testing never landed in the remote. Signing still lives inside Generate & Submit.

  • Agent message history lands in the remote

    Secrets in chat, unpublished prompt experiments, and a0-only preview caches need an include-or-drop pass. The extract is source, Expo config, and a written Convex vs Supabase map.

  • Install only succeeds inside an open a0 session

    Replace “works because the agent just ran it” with install, typecheck/test, and EAS build profiles. Fail if the app only bootstraps in a0’s preview shell.

  • Certificates exist only inside a0’s publish flow

    If provisioning and Play signing keys never leave Generate & Submit, a platform outage blocks every hotfix. Move signing into org-controlled EAS credential stores.

  • Web preview hid native-only surfaces

    Payments, push, camera, and biometrics need IPA/APK proof. Capture Expo SDK/runtime explicitly so OTA planning does not invent compatibility.

The extract sequence that actually boots

Pull, pin, remap, then prove eas build without a0 open

Product behavior stays. Generate & Submit GUI and preview assumptions leave. The destination is a conventional EAS profile from a named checkout.

01

Take application source, Expo config, and the backend map

Leave agent transcripts and preview caches out. Capture deep-link schemes and payment product IDs so CI does not invent them.

02

Group agent-touched screens into maintainable Expo modules

Pin Expo SDK in config. Encode agent assumptions as CI-tested packages—not chat archaeology.

03

Mint destination Convex/Supabase and payment secrets

Never commit a0 panel dumps. Point Auth, push (FCM where used), and purchases at production projects on a native build.

04

Prove build → device install with the agent closed

The destination ships from that checkout alone. a0-only publish is no longer required for production tracks.

How to

Extract an a0.dev Expo tree into standard owned mobile CI

Expo-plus-store extract. Success is build → device install with no open a0 agent and no a0-only publish for production tracks.

  1. Step 01

    Decide what belongs in the extract versus what stays in a0

    Take application source, Expo config, navigation and screens the agent generated, and a written map of Convex vs Supabase wiring. Leave agent message history (especially with secrets) and unpublished prompt experiments out.

  2. Step 02

    Map agent edits into maintainable Expo modules

    Pin Expo SDK and lockfiles. Replace “works because the agent just ran it” with install, typecheck/test, and EAS build profiles.

  3. Step 03

    Move store signing and provisioning off a0

    Certificates, profiles, and Play keys go into org-controlled EAS/credential stores. Verify a clean CI upload to internal tracks.

  4. Step 04

    Remount Convex/Supabase, deep links, and payments

    Mint new secrets. Update schemes that still point at a0 preview. Verify Auth and purchases on a native build—not only react-native-web.

  5. Step 05

    Prove the destination ships from checkout alone

    build → device install with the agent closed. Rotate old a0-visible secret values after cutover. Generate & Submit is then optional.

Verified on Clutch · 29 reviews

Clarity over theater

See all reviews on Clutch
What impressed us most about CodeCross was their ability to deeply understand our vision and translate it into a complete digital solution. Unlike many agencies that just focus on technical delivery, CodeCross approached our project like true partners.

Harris Edelmam

CEO · Ombligo, Inc.

Read on Clutch
Their project management was top-notch.

Greg Moreno Earle

Technology Executive · Driven Brands Inc.

Read on Clutch
Their eye for clean, modern design combined with technical excellence was very impressive.

Robert Valentino

Founder · Lean Coach

Read on Clutch
We appreciated Codecross's practiced approach to development.

Brice Wiley

Marketing Director · Lex Mundi

Read on Clutch
On the development side, everything has gone quite smoothly and perfectly.

Brandon Patterson

Co-Owner · Cap Tech Services, LLC.

Read on Clutch
They are very thorough in their approach to the project.

Lukas Haynes

Member Board of Directors · Protect Our Winters Action Fund

Read on Clutch

Before you book

Practical answers

Prefer writing? Send project details and we reply within one business day.

What comes out of an a0 React Native/Expo extract versus what stays in a0?

Take application source, Expo config, navigation and screens the agent generated, and a written map of Convex vs Supabase wiring. Leave agent message history (especially with secrets), a0-only preview caches, and unpublished prompt experiments out of the remote unless explicitly needed. Capture env *names* the agent assumed so CI does not invent config.

How do you map a0 agent edits into maintainable Expo modules?

Group agent-touched screens into clear packages, pin Expo SDK and dependency versions in lockfiles, and replace “works because the agent just ran it” steps with install, typecheck/test, and EAS build profiles. Fail the pipeline if the app only bootstraps inside an open a0 session. Encode agent assumptions as CI-tested modules—not chat archaeology.

Why must store signing and provisioning leave a0 before calling migration done?

If certificates, provisioning profiles, and Play signing keys only exist inside a0’s publish flow, a platform outage or account loss blocks every hotfix. Move signing into org-controlled EAS/credentials stores, verify a clean CI upload to internal tracks, then retire a0 as the sole uploader. Apple and Google developer accounts stay yours either way—ownership of the *pipeline* is the migration bar.

What fails first when CI builds Expo without a0’s injected preview runtime?

Missing backend env, Auth redirect schemes still pointing at a0 preview deep links, native config that assumed a0’s build chrome, and assets the agent never committed. Normalize app.json/eas.json, schemes, and secrets first; then push. A green a0 preview is not a portable Expo artifact.

Ship from checkout—not from the Generate & Submit GUI.

Bring the Expo tree and the start command a0 assumed. We will say whether this is a portable mobile artifact — or an app that only boots while the agent session is open.

Prefer writing? Send project details on the contact page.

Book a Discovery Call